ISR off-site mitigation administrative fee

“The purpose of this rule is to recover District's costs for administering the requirements of District Rule 9510 (Indirect Source Review).”

“Each developer that is subject to the off-site emission reduction fees under District Rule 9510 shall pay to the District an administrative fee equal to four percent (4%) of the required off-site fees for the District's cost of administering the off-site emission reduction program as outlined in Rule 9510.”

“District: the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District including Fresno, Kings, Madera, Merced, San Joaquin, Stanislaus, and Tulare Counties, and the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin portion of Kern County.”

2005-12-15

“RULE 3180 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES FOR INDIRECT SOURCE REVIEW (ISR) (Adopted December 15, 2005; Amended January 17, 2008; Amended April 16, 2015; Amended April 19, 2018; Amended May 15, 2025, effective July 1, 2026)”

“RULE 3180 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES FOR INDIRECT SOURCE REVIEW (ISR) (Adopted December 15, 2005; Amended January 17, 2008; Amended April 16, 2015; Amended April 19, 2018; Amended May 15, 2025, effective July 1, 2026)”

“Notification of Fee Amount and Payment: The administrative fees for off-site projects shall be paid at the same time as the off-site emission reduction fees.”

“Public Agency Review of the proposed project: ... No section or provision within this rule requires action on the part of the public agency.”

“Development projects that have a mitigated baseline below two (2.0) tons per year of NOx and two (2.0) tons per year of PM10 shall be exempt from the requirements in Sections 6.0 and 7.0.”

“The applicant shall receive credit for any off-site emission reduction measures that have been completed and/or paid for, prior to December 15, 2005, if the following conditions have been met:”

“RULE 3180 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES FOR INDIRECT SOURCE REVIEW (ISR) (Adopted December 15, 2005; ... Amended May 15, 2025, effective July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026)”